To achieve a revenue neutral structure, adjustments
to GST rates could be carried out in a phased manner
While the Council should consider aligning the rates to
pre-GST levels, it should be guided by the objective of
streamlining the multiple rate structure, reducing the
slabs. The situation has, however, been complicated by
the recent surge in inflation.
In September last year, the GST Council had tasked a
group of ministers to look into the contentious issue of
rate rationalisation. The GoM, headed by Karnataka Chief
Minister Basavaraj Bommai, was also expected to examine
the issue of the inverted duty structure and review the
list of goods that were exempted from the tax. The
rationale for setting up the committee was
straightforward — to expand the tax base and boost
revenues. While GST collections have improved of late —
collections touched an all-time high of Rs 1.42 lakh
crore in March — on the whole, they have fallen short of
expectations. And considering that GST forms a
substantial part of general government tax revenue,
lower than expected collections have fiscal implications
at both the central and state levels. For states which
are unlikely to have the cushion of revenue garnered
through the compensation cess after June this year, the
situation will be particularly challenging in the
absence of a significant pick-up in overall collections.
The lower than expected
collections can, in part, be attributed to issues of
compliance, and lower tax rates. While, over the years,
the GST Council has taken steps to not only address the
administrative issues, but also to also raise compliance
levels, the tax rates levied continue to remain lower as
compared to those under the earlier regime. As per a
report by the RBI, the weighted average GST rate fell
from 14.4 per cent at the time of inception to 11.6 per
cent in 2019 as a consequence of a series of tax cuts
between November 2017 and December 2018. To put this in
perspective, the Subramanian Committee report had
estimated the revenue neutral rate at 15.5 per cent.
|
|
Considering the current rate structure — there are
several rates, ranging from zero to special rates for
diamonds and jewellery, the standard rates of 5 per
cent, 12 per cent and 18 per cent and the top rate of 28
per cent — several suggestions have been made to
simplify the rate structure and achieve revenue
neutrality. These range from reducing the exemptions
given to merging the 12 per cent and 18 per cent slabs
to raising the 5 per cent slab to 8 per cent. As per
reports, the GST Council in its meeting next month is
likely to delve into these issues. While the Council
should consider aligning the rates to pre-GST levels, it
should be guided by the objective of streamlining the
multiple rate structure, reducing the slabs. The
situation has, however, been complicated by the recent
surge in inflation. Retail inflation, as measured by the
consumer price index, rose to 6.95 per cent in March,
and is unlikely to subside quickly. Thus, rather than
opting for a one-time adjustment to the rate structure,
perhaps a more prudent approach would be to opt for a
phased recalibration.
Source:::THE INDIAN EXPRESS,
dated 27/04/2022.
|